Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Xinyu Gao vs Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gao vs Kerkhove analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On This Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Xinyu Gao vs Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Gao 2 - 0 Kerkhove
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gao has won 45.6% of points on their second serve, while Kerkhove has won 44.78%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gao, in recent form, has won 55.88% of their opponent's second serve points, while Kerkhove has won 54.76%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.55% and 35.16% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gao has saved 54.78% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kerkhove has saved 52.63% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gao has won 73.53% of matches played (W/L 50/ 18), with Kerkhove winning 44.78% (W/L 30/ 37) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gao has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 70% (W/L 30/ 13), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Kerkhove has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 189/ 115), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 47% (W/L 25/ 28).
- Player level: In the last year, Gao has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 76.92% of matches (W/L 50/ 15), where as Kerkhove has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 44.44% of matches (W/L 28/ 35). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Gao winning 2 times and Kerkhove being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Gao winning 4 and Kerkhove winning 0. The last match between Gao and Kerkhove was at the W40 Porto, 20-07-2023, Third, Hard with Xinyu Gao getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:20:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gao and Kerkhove have played a deciding set 0 times, with Gao winning 0 times and Kerkhove 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Gao winning 0, and Kerkhove 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gao has played against opponents with an average rank of 268.81 while Kerkhove has played against players with an average rank of 326.48.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gao has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kerkhove has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gao has converted 51.22% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kerkhove has converted 47.66% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
187
Rank
180
High
26
Age
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
284
Rank
135
High
32
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
Form
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
63% (230-138)
Career Total W/L
56% (510-393)
72% (21-8)
YTD W/L
31% (9-20)
$10,915
Career Prize Money
$509,214
3
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Xinyu Gao vs Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Gao VS Kerkhove
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
| stats | Xinyu Gao | Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 24 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| DFs Total | 1 | 11 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:20:0 | 1:20:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (63/100) | 59% (71/121) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 60% (38/63) | 46% (33/71) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 54% (20/37) | 46% (23/50) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 55% (12/22) | 67% (6/9) |
| Return Points W% | 54% (65/121) | 42% (42/100) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats 
Xinyu Gao
Player
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Xinyu Gao
Player
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
49%
(
17 of
35)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
51%
(
30 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Xinyu Gao | Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 72% (21/8) | 31% (9/20) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 70% (47/20) | 37% (25/43) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (344/278) | 46% (290/347) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 87% (20/3) | 30% (3/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 31% (4/9) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 33% (2/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.18 | 0.09 |
| Aces Total | 55 | 27 |
| DFs per game | 0.32 | 0.31 |
| DFs Total | 96 | 95 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:50:20 | 1:34:35 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 344.55 | 293.34 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1235/1985) | 67% (1386/2076) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (786/1235) | 58% (803/1386) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (342/750) | 45% (309/690) |
| BPs Won% Total | 51% (126/246) | 48% (102/214) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (888/1891) | 42% (860/2042) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/2) | 67% (2/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 78% (21/6) | 28% (7/18) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 72% (21/29) | 31% (9/29) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 17% (1/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 44% (4/9) | 30% (3/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 90% (21/19) | 70% (10/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 10% (21/2) | 30% (10/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (8/2) | 11% (19/2) |
Xinyu Gao Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Zhuoxuan Bai
Player
Xinyu Gao
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
51%
(
29 of
57)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Xinyu Gao
Player
Martyna Kubka
57%
(
47 of
83)
1st Serve %
65%
(
72 of
110)
3
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
5
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
42 of
72)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
34%
(
28 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
50 of
110)
105
Total Points Won
88
|
5-7 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Xinyu Gao
Player
Manon Leonard
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
63%
(
46 of
73)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
70
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Xinyu Gao
Player
Mariam Bolkvadze
58%
(
48 of
83)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
8
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
34%
(
12 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
53%
(
44 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 0-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Xinyu Gao
Player
Katarina Kuzmova
69%
(
57 of
83)
1st Serve %
55%
(
47 of
85)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
46%
(
38 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
85)
89
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Xinyu Gao
Player
Rinko Matsuda
50%
(
27 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dalma Galfi
Player
Xinyu Gao
57%
(
53 of
93)
1st Serve %
45%
(
43 of
95)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
36 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
100
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Xinyu Gao
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
6 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Xinyu Gao
Player
Lucija Ciric Bagaric
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rutuja Bhosale
Player
Xinyu Gao
70%
(
56 of
80)
1st Serve %
63%
(
66 of
105)
0
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
10
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
41 of
66)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
44%
(
35 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
51 of
105)
96
Total Points Won
89
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Daria Kuczer
Player
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove
84%
(
75 of
89)
1st Serve %
67%
(
58 of
87)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
43%
(
38 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
45 of
87)
96
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
Player
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
67%
(
64 of
96)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
52 of
96)
91
Total Points Won
68
|
4-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove
Player
Jessie Aney
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
42 of
74)
0
Aces
15
4
Double Faults
4
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Seone Mendez
Player
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve %
70%
(
23 of
33)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
11 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
52
Total Points Won
19
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mona Barthel
Player
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove
65%
(
55 of
85)
1st Serve %
69%
(
66 of
95)
13
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
2
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
39 of
66)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
45 of
95)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arianna Zucchini
Player
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove
49%
(
40 of
82)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
3
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
5
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
36%
(
15 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
46%
(
38 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove
Player
Cristina Ramos Sierra
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
8
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Charo Esquiva Banuls
Player
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
73%
(
40 of
55)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
1
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
18 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daria Kudashova
Player
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
71%
(
51 of
72)
2
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
4
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Gao Vs Kerkhove Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Gao are available here and Kerkhove photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
